Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.
Submitted manuscripts will be reviewed by two or three external experts. When asking for revisions, reviewers have two possible goals: to ask authors to tighten their arguments based on existing data or to identify areas where more data are needed. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation normally allows authors a maximum of two revisions of a manuscript. Peer reviewers are asked to say if the manuscript is not sufficiently clearly written for publication. In such cases authors are asked to revise the manuscript, seeking, if necessary, the assistance of colleagues or a commercial editing service. Edited by Joan Rovira, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is supported by an expert Editorial Board.
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation considers manuscripts spanning a wide range of scientific interests, as long as the results and conclusions are scientifically justified and not misleading.
Annual Journal Metrics
115 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only
92 days to first decision for all manuscripts
211 days from submission to acceptance
16 days from acceptance to publication
465 Altmetric mentions