Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Google Scholar
PBAC (Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee). Guidelines for preparing a submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. 5th ed. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2016.
Google Scholar
CADTH (Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health). Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies. 4th ed. Ottowa: CADTH; 2017.
Google Scholar
NICE (National Institute of Health and Care Excellence). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE; 2013.
Google Scholar
SMC (Scottish Medicines Consortium). Guidance to manufacturers for completion of new product assessment form (NPAF). Glasgow: NHS Scotland; 2017.
Google Scholar
Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess. 1989;5:559–75.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Brooks R. EQ-5D, the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53–72.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7(6):503–20.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res. 1976;11:478–507.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1999;8:209–24.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen DL. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(2):215–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Google Scholar
Petrou S. Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Econ. 2003;12(8):697–702.
Article
Google Scholar
Chen G, Ratcliffe J. A review of the development and application of generic multi-attribute utility instruments for paediatric populations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(10):1013–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Stevens K. Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1105–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Richardson J, Peacock S, Hawthorne G, Iezzi A, Elsworth G, Day N. Construction of the descriptive system for the assessment of quality of life AQoL-6D utility instrument. Health Qual Life Out. 2012;10(1):38.
Article
Google Scholar
Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H, et al. Quality of life in early adolesence: a sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:205–11.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Apajasalo M, Rautonen J, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H, et al. Quality of life in pre-adolescence: a 17-dimensional health-related measure (17D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5(6):532–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burstrom K, Cavrini G, Devlin N, et al. Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):875–86.
Article
Google Scholar
Seiber WJ, Groessl EJ, David KM, Ganiats TG, Kaplan RM. Quality of Well Being Self-Administered (QWB-SA) Scale User’s Manual. San Diego: Health Services Research Center, University of California; 2008.
Google Scholar
Beusterien KM, Yeung JE, Pang F, Brazier J. Development of the multi-attribute Adolescent Health Utility Measure (AHUM). Health Qual Life Out. 2012;10:102.
Article
Google Scholar
Jabrayilov R, Vermeulen KM, Detzel P, Dainelli L, van Asselt ADI, Krabbe PFM. Valuing health status in the first year of life: the infant health-related quality of life instrument. Value Health. 2019;22(6):721–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Oluboyede Y, Robinson T. Measuring weight-specific quality of life in adolescents: an examination of the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the WAItE. Value Health. 2019;22(3):348–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Kularatna S, Amilani U, Senanayake S, Tonmukayakul U, Jamieson L, Arrow P. Developing an early childhood oral health impact-specific health-state classification system for a new preference-based instrument, the ECOHIS-4D. Community Dent Oral. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12650.
Bailey C, Dalziel K, Cronin P, Devlin N, Viney R. Quality Of Life in Kids: Key Evidence to Strengthen Decisions in Australia (QUOKKA) Project Team. How are child-specific utility instruments used in decision making in Australia? A review of Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee public summary documents. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022;40(2):157–82.
Article
Google Scholar
Khadka J, Kwon J, Petrou S, Lancsar E, Ratcliffe J. Mind the (inter-rater) gap. An empirical investigation of self-reported versus proxy-reported assessments in the derivation of childhood utility values for economic evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2019;240:112543.
Article
Google Scholar
Dolan P, Olsen JA, Menzel P, Richardson J. An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health. Health Econ. 2003;12(7):545–51.
Article
Google Scholar
Mott DJ, Shah KK, Ramos Goni JM, Devlin NJ, Rivero-Arias O. Valuing EQ-5D-Y-3L health states using a discrete choice experiment: Do adult and adolescent preferences differ? Med Decis Making. 2021;41(5):584–96.
Article
Google Scholar
Ramos Goni JM, Oppe M, Stolk E, Shah KK, Kreimeier S, Rivero-Arias O, Devlin NJ. International valuation protocol for the Eq. 5DY3L. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020;38:653–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Kwon J, Freijser L, Huynh E, Howell M, Chen G, Khan KA, et al. Systematic review of conceptual, age, measurement and valuation considerations for generic multidimensional childhood patient-reported outcome measures. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01128-0.
Powell PA, Rowen D, Rivero-Arias O, Tsuchiya A, Brazier JE. Valuing child and adolescent health: a qualitative study on different perspectives and priorities taken by the adult general public. Health Qual Life Out. 2021;19(1):222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01858-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Thorrington D, Eames K. Measuring health utilities in children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0135672.
Article
Google Scholar
Rowen D, Mukuria C, Powell P, Wailoo A, Wong R. Valuing child health: exploring the use of a mixed sample of adolescents and adults to value child and adolescent health states. School of Health and Related Research. University of Sheffield: NICE Decision Support Unit Report. 2021.
Dakin H, Abel L, Burns R, Yang Y. Review and critical appraisal of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database and application of the MAPS statement. Health Qual Life Out. 2018;16(1):31.
Article
Google Scholar
Kromm SK, Bethell J, Kraglund F, Edwards SA, Laporte A, Coyte PC, et al. Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(8):1315–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Petrou S. Methodological and applied concerns surrounding age-related weighting within health economic evaluation. Expert Rev Pharm Out. 2014;14(5):729–40.
Google Scholar
Petrou S, Kandala NB, Robinson A, Baker R. A person trade-off study to estimate age-related weights for health gains in economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(10):893–907.
Article
Google Scholar
Aldy JE, Viscusi WK. Age differences in the value of statistical life: revealed preference evidence. Rev Env Econ Policy. 2007;1(2):241–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Baker R, Bateman I, Donaldson C, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Loomes G, et al, SVQ Research Team. Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(27):1–162.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lancsar E, Wildman J, Donaldson C, Ryan M, Baker R. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):466–78.
Article
Google Scholar
Gu Y, Lancsar E, Ghijben P, Butler JR, Donaldson C. Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: a systematic review of what counts and to what extent. Soc Sci Med. 2015;146:41–52.
Article
Google Scholar