Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of simulated cumulative EC incidence and mortality among different screening strategies

From: Modeling the Cost-effectiveness of Esophageal Cancer Screening in China

Age

Strategy

CI (per 100,000)

CM (per 100,000)

RCI (%)

RCM (%)

Scr* vs No_Scr

Scr_fol vs Scr_nfol

Scr* vs No_Scr

Scr_fol vs Scr_nfol

40–44

Non_scr

1010.62

776.76

–

–

–

–

Scr_nfol

711.21

555.45

− 29.63

–

− 28.49

–

Scr_fol

708.61

553.32

− 29.88

− 0.37

− 28.77

− 0.38

45–49

Non_scr

1010.04

778.32

–

–

–

–

Scr_nfol

719.08

587.97

− 28.81

–

− 24.46

–

Scr_fol

708.81

579.22

− 29.82

− 1.43

− 25.58

− 1.49

50–54

Non_scr

994.97

766.49

–

–

–

–

Scr_nfol

726.70

642.84

− 26.96

–

− 16.13

–

Scr_fol

701.17

619.77

− 29.53

− 3.51

− 19.14

− 3.59

55–59

Non_scr

962.42

746.15

–

–

–

–

Scr_nfol

748.82

767.25

− 22.19

–

2.83

–

Scr_fol

691.03

709.45

− 28.20

− 7.72

− 4.92

− 7.53

60–64

Non_scr

857.84

649.89

–

–

–

–

Scr_nfol

720.35

829.78

− 16.03

–

27.68

–

Scr_fol

637.03

738.52

− 25.74

− 11.57

13.64

− 11.00

65–69

Non_scr

710.26

512.38

–

–

–

–

Scr_nfol

696.12

952.77

− 1.99

–

85.95

–

Scr_fol

576.12

806.34

− 18.89

− 17.24

57.37

− 15.37

  1. Scr_fol screening with follow-up, Scr_nfol screening without follow-up, Non_scr nonscreening, Scr* screening with or without follow-up, CI cumulative EC incidence, CM cumulative EC mortality, RCI reduction in cumulative incidence compared to an alternative strategy, RCM reduction in cumulative mortality compared to an alternative strategy