Skip to main content

Table 3 Base-case cost-effectiveness results from the Chinese private payers perspective

From: Methodology and results of cost-effectiveness of LDL-C lowering with evolocumab in patients with acute myocardial infarction in China

 

Cost, CNY

QALY

ICER, CNY

Total

Incremental

Total

Incremental

PEACE

     

 Statins

324863.85

NA

8.19

NA

NA

 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W

368018.46

43154.61

8.54

0.35

121986.67

 Statins + Evo 420mgQM

395266.35

70402.50

8.54

0.35

199009.25

BERSONa

     

 Statins

306842.49

NA

9.64

NA

NA

 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W

351529.31

44686.82

10.18

0.54

83078.56

 Statins + Evo 420mgQM

387231.89

80389.40

10.13

0.49

165565.29

SuValue®, LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl

     

 Statins

330228.73

NA

8.33

NA

NA

 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W

346469.52

16240.78

8.92

0.59

27423.06

 Statins + Evo 420mgQM

375671.63

45442.90

8.92

0.59

76731.73

SuValue®, LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl

     

 Statins

312147.77

NA

8.39

NA

NA

 Statins + Evo 140mgQ2W

340101.64

27953.87

8.86

0.48

58806.29

 Statins + Evo 420mgQM

369069.97

56922.20

8.86

0.48

119746.70

  1. CNY, Chinese Yuan; Evo 140mgQ2W, evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks; Evo 420mgQM, evolocumab 420 mg monthly; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MI, myocardial infarction; NA, not applicable
  2. a: The background statin in the BERSON study was atorvastatin 20 mg/d