Skip to main content

Table 2 The final seven criteria selected for inclusion in the survey, their definitions and possible range of values

From: Developing and validating a multi-criteria decision analytic tool to assess the value of cancer clinical trials: evaluating cancer clinical trial value

Metric

Definition

Unmet need

The trial addresses a problem either without a solution or a very poor solution. This could be a rare disease with no treatment options and poor survival. The 5-year survival rates of particular cancers can range from 85% (Good treatment options and therefore there is little to be learnt from another trial) to 18% (There are poor treatment options and thus research in this area will likely be very beneficial or impactful).

Size of target population

The burden or prevalence of the target disease the trial seeks to address. A rare disease may only affect 0.2 people / 100,000 while a common disease may affect 1000 people / 100,000.

Eligible participants can access the trial (access to trials)

Eligible patients have equal opportunity to enrol in a clinical trial regardless of their geographic location and its associated limitations. Possible responses range from 1 to 5. With 1 = Less than 20% of eligible patients have access to a trial due to geographic limitations and 5 = 100% of eligible patients have access to a trial.

Patient outcomes

The increase in overall survival for patients. From a 3 month increase, to 3 years additional survival.

Total trial

cost

The total cost of running the trial to completion. This ranges between 105 million AUD (expensive) to 3 million AUD (least expensive).

Academic impact

The number of citations the primary publication of trial results receives in the academic and clinical literature. This could range from 10 to 1000 citations.

Use of trial results

Whether the results of the trial directly influenced future directions of the research. There are four options: (1) No use of results; (2) informing research decisions such as continuation to another phase, e.g. phase I to II; (3) granting of regulatory approval e.g. FDA or PBS approval; (4) was used to inform policy. The trial results in order of increasing value are, (1) no use of results, (2) informed research decisions, (3) granted regulatory approval, (4) informed policy.