Table 5 Cost-effectiveness analysis of RAGT compared to conventional kinesiotherapy
Mean improvement in GMFM after 20 TUs in % | ICER LOKO vs. CON per 1 TU (2013, 2022) | ICER LOKO vs. CON per 20 TUs (2013, 2022) | Years | Price/costs of 1 TU of LOKO in € | Price/costs of 20 TUs LOKO in € | C/E per 1 TU of LOKO/CON | C/E per 20 TUs of LOKO/CON | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lokomat® | 9.43 | 3.52 11.59 | 70.38 231.94 | 2013 | 57.73 | 1,154.6 | 6.12 | 122.43 |
2022 | 137.25 | 2,745 | 14.53 | 291.09 | ||||
Conventional kinesiotherapy | 0.8 | 2013 | 27.36 | 547.2 | 34.2 | 684 | ||
2022 | 37.17 | 743.4 | 46.46 | 929.25 |