Skip to main content

Table 6 Cost-effectiveness ranking per patient (patient perspective)

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China

Strategy

Cost (US$)

Incr cost (US$)

Eff(QALY)

Incr Eff(QALY)

Incr C/E (US$/QALY)

NMB (US$)

INMB (US$)

C/E (US$/QALY)

Sorafenib

16,109.80

0.00

1.30

0.00

0.00

31,470.20

0.00

12,392.15

Lenvatinib

23,654.81

7,545.01

1.34

0.04

188,625.25

25,389.19

− 6,081.01

17,652.84

Sintilimab-Bevacizumab

39,406.40

23,296.60

1.61

0.31

75,150.32

19,519.60

− 11,950.60

24,476.02

Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab

141,836.73

125,726.93

2.17

0.87

144,513.71

 − 62,414.73

− 93,884.93

65,362.55

  1. C/E cost/effectiveness, Eff effectiveness, Incr incremental, INMB incremental net monetary benefits, NMB net monetary benefits