Skip to main content

Table 3 Model results for CRT-P device treatment compared to CRT-D device treatment for 15 years, 10 years, and maximum of follow-up (6 years)

From: A long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiac resynchronisation therapy with or without defibrillator based on health claims data

Model results

Variable

CRT-P

CRT-D

Difference

Base case: Extrapolation to 15 years

Costs (€)

81,241.24

94,334.54

 − 13,093.3

 

Life Years

6.55

6.85

 − 0.30

 

ICER

  

43,964.91

Extrapolation to 10 years

Costs (€)

72,870.11

84,609.29

 − 11,739.18

 

Life Years

5.86

6.15

 − 0.29

 

ICER

  

40,823.75

Maximum follow-up (6 years)

Costs (€)

56,764,79

68,728.73

 − 11,693.94

 

Life years

4.49

4.64

 − 0.15

 

ICER

  

77,865.49

  1. CRT-P: cardiac biventricular pacemaker, CRT-D: cardiac biventricular defibrillator, ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio