Table 3 Indicator of the divergence degree (%) between the “reference” or “independent” ICER and the conventional ICER
From: Some reflections on the use of inappropriate comparators in CEA
New programmes | \({ICER}_{\left({p}_{i},{d}_{i}\right)}\) | \({ICER}_{\left({p}_{i},r\right)}\) | \({I}_{\left({p}_{i},d,r\right) }(\%)\) |
|---|---|---|---|
\({p}_{1}\) | 5000 | 45,455 | 809 |
\({p}_{2}\) | 20,000 | 45,455 | 127 |
\({p}_{3}\) | 180,000 | 45,455 | −75 |
\({p}_{4}\) | 5000 | 100,000 | 1900 |
\({p}_{5}\) | 20,000 | 154,545 | 673 |