Skip to main content

Table 8 Bivariate sensitivity analysis

From: The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free foetal DNA for the detection of Down syndrome in the Spanish National Health Service: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Testing strategy

1st and 2nd trimester screening (current screening)

NIPT as contingent testing

NIPT as first-line testing

Screening uptake of 89.97%

Effectiveness

No of women undergoing 1st and 2nd trimester screening tests

66,799

66,799

1534

No of women undergoing NIPT

0

3152

76,684

No of NIPT with a positive result

0

251

322

No of ITa

3275

579

805

No of procedure-related miscarriages

23

4

5

No of T21 cases detected

271

269

341

Costs

1st and 2nd trimester screening tests

€5,292,716

€5,292,716

€116,584

NIPT = €150

€0

€491,550

€12,559,350

NIPT = €76

€0

€249,052

€6,363,404

IT

€3,093,565

€546,923

€760,403

Hospitalisation due to amniotic fluid leakage and pregnancy termination owing to T21

€515,591

€469,362

€596,616

Total cost when NIPT = €150

€8,901,872

€6,800,551

€14,032,953

Total cost when NIPT = €76

€8,901,872

€6,558,053

€7,837,007

Economic analysis

NIPT as first-line testing vs 1st and 2nd trimester screening

NIPT as contingent testing vs 1st and 2nd trimester screening

NIPT as first-line testing vs NIPT as contingent testing

Incremental cost when TPNI = €150

€5,131,081

€− 2,101,321

€7,232,402

Incremental cost when TPNI = €76

€− 1,064,865

€− 2,343,819

€1,278,954

Incremental effectiveness (T21 extra cases detected)

70

− 2

72

ICER (€/T21 extra case detected) when NIPT = €150

73,301

100,450

ICER (€/T21 extra case detected) when NIPT = €76

Dominant

17,763

  1. ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; IT, invasive tests; NIPT, non-invasive prenatal testing; T21, trisomy 21
  2. aOut of the total number of invasive diagnostic test performed, 271 correspond to pregnant women with a NT ≥ 3.5 mm (considered high-risk)