Skip to main content

Table 3 Results table

From: What are we paying for? A cost-effectiveness analysis of patented denosumab and generic alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in Australia

Analysis

Denosumab

Alendronate

Differences

ICER

Costs

QALYs

Costs

QALYs

Costs

QALYs

Base case

$5483

5.823

$4037

5.817

$1446

0.006

$246,749

Risk fracture equation parameters:

Lower 95 % confidence limit ICER

$5233

5.829

$3824

5.822

$1346

0.005

$191,164

Upper 95 % confidence limit ICER

$5660

5.840

$4287

5.834

$1431

0.007

$282,342

% change in BMD sensitivity scenarios (see Table 1)

$5534

5.812

$4123

5.805

$1411

0.006

$223,458

Year 3, 50 % of non-persistence in year 2

$5485

5.825

$4039

5.820

$1445

0.005

$272,323

Lower 95 % interval fracture SMR

$5498

5.860

$4107

5.855

$1391

0.006

$243,293

Upper 95 % interval fracture SMR

$5381

5.769

$3969

5.761

$1412

0.007

$197,015

Fracture costs × 0.75

$4943

5.828

$3494

5.822

$1449

0.006

$251,018

Fracture costs × 1.25

$5924

5.841

$4578

5.835

$1347

0.006

$217,746

Lower 95 % interval fracture utility multipliers

$5462

5.801

$4077

5.792

$1385

0.008

$163,384

Upper 95 % interval fracture utility multipliers

$5464

5.866

$4073

5.862

$1392

0.004

$378,871

‘No fracture’ utility = 1

$5447

7.292

$4056

7.284

$1390

0.007

$188,997

No discounting

$6403

7.117

$4913

7.109

$1490

0.008

$181,755

All patients contribute $6.10 per prescription

$5326

5.839

$3829

5.833

$1497

0.006

$260,582

Denosumab cost reduced by 50 %

$4370

5.835

$4060

5.829

$310

0.006

$50,068

  1. SMR standardized mortality ratio