Skip to main content

Table 3 Cost-effectiveness for varying subsidy and compliance rates

From: Cost-effectiveness implications of GP intervention to promote physical activity: evidence from Perth, Australia

Compliance Rate

100%

75%

50%

25%

20%

10%

Health loss (DALYs) averted

6,286

4,844

3,322

1,710

1377

697

Health expenditure averted ($ Million)

53

35

24

13

10

5

Cost effectiveness ($/DALY) with 20$ subsidy

(810)e

2,649

7,162

20,747

27,546

61,558

Cost effectiveness ($/DALY) with 25$ subsidy

1,099

5,126

10,775

27,762

36,263

78,781

Cost effectiveness ($/DALY) with 50$ subsidy

10,644

17,511

28,835

62,840

79,848

164,896

  1. (.)e, indicates a dominant strategy where benefits gained or the value of burden avoided exceeds cost of subsidy.
Back to article page

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

ISSN: 1478-7547

Contact us