Skip to main content

Table 2 Linear regression exploring the impact of work-status on VAS scores and EQ-5D utilities (n = 830)

From: Do the Washington Panel recommendations hold for Europe: investigating the relation between quality of life versus work-status, absenteeism and presenteeism

 

VAS scores (self-reported health)

Utilities European EQ-5D value set

 

B

Std. error

Beta

B

Std. error

Beta

Work status

      
 

Absent versus working

-3.882

2.524

-.047

-.027

.021

-.037

 

Disabled versus working

-9.504

2.021

-.152***

-.101

.017

-.186***

 

Unemployed versus working

-6.118

1.640

-.117***

-.050

.014

-.109***

Age (years)

.104

.065

.049

.001

.001

.062*

Gender (1: male, 2: female)

1.501

1.326

.033

.012

.011

.031

Pain (range 0-100)

-.026

.024

-.034

-.001

.000

-.168***

Disease duration (years)

-.111

.064

-.052*

-.001

.001

-.033

Restriction due to disease

      
 

Seriously restricted versus not restricted

-32.649

2.346

-.592***

-.247

.020

-.514***

 

Somewhat restricted versus not restricted

-15.443

1.780

-.345***

-.071

.015

-.184***

 

Note: R-square .308

Note: R-square .354

  1. *p <0.10; **p <0.01; ***p <0.001.