Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the base-case and one-way sensitivity analyses (24 weeks)

From: Cost-utility of ferric carboxymaltose (Ferinject®) for iron-deficiency anemia patients with chronic heart failure in South Korea

Variables

Input values

Incremental costs

(US $)

Incremental

QALYs

ICER (US $ per QALY gained)

Base case

 

466

0.0210

22,192 (₩25,010,451/QALY)

Cost ratio from Berry 2001 [27]

 

483

0.0210

23,013

  NYHA class I

0.049

   

  NYHA class II

0.049

   

  NYHA class III

0.120

   

  NYHA class IV

0.831

   

Utilities from the mean of 2 studies based on advanced CHF patients [23, 24]

466

0.0224

20,805

  NYHA class I

0.97

   

  NYHA class II

0.8

   

  NYHA class III

0.63

   

  NYHA class IV

0.37

   

Utilities from the mean of 3 principal utility studies [2224]

466

0.0239

19,508

  NYHA class I

0.95

   

  NYHA class II

0.79

   

  NYHA class III

0.60

   

  NYHA class IV

0.36

   

FCM price ±15% (US $)

136-184

370-562

0.0210

17,630-26,754

Total number of FCM vials ± 1 vial

3-5

306-626

0.0210

14,588-29,796

CHF medical cost ± 25%

US$1,185–1,975

  

20,028-24,356

Utilities according to NYHA class (± 10%)

  NYHA class I: ± 10%

0.84-1

  

20,485-24,954*

  NYHA class II: ± 10%

0.70-0.86

  

17,797-29,469*

  NYHA class III: ± 10%

0.55-0.67

  

17,945-29,073

  NYHA class IV: ± 10%

0.40-0.48

  

21,737-22,667

Effect-onset time

sixth day

466

0.0204

22,873

Baseline CHF patient distribution from the expert survey

 

191

0.0547

3,496

  NYHA class II

58.3%

   

  NYHA class III

41.7%

   
  1. (US $1 = Kor ₩1,127).
  2. CHF, chronic heart failure; FMC, ferric carboxymaltose; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; NYHA, New York Heart Association.
  3. The mean of 2 results from the study of Kirsch and McGuire (2000) [21] was used.
  4. A value of 1 was applied instead of 1.023 because utility weight cannot be more than 1, although the utility weight was 1.023 in NYHA class ± 10%.
  5. As the CHF medical cost increased, the ICER decreased.
  6. *As the utility weight increased, the ICER decreased.