From: Cost-effectiveness of seven-days-per-week rehabilitation schedule for acute stroke patients
Parameter | Lower case | Base case | Upper case | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔQALY | ΔCost ($) | ($/QALY) | ΔQALY | ΔCost ($) | ICER ($/QALY) | ΔQALY | ΔCost ($) | ICER ($/QALY) | |
Efficacy of the intervention (risk ratio of mRS0-2 patients) | 0.083 | − 652 | Dominant | 0.132 | − 1524 | Dominant | 0.182 | − 2424 | Dominant |
mRS distribution (mRS3-5) | 0.093 | − 430 | Dominant | 0.184 | − 3138 | Dominant | |||
mRS distribution (mRS0-2) | 0.164 | − 2000 | Dominant | 0.10 | − 917 | Dominant | |||
Discount rate | 0.138 | − 1603 | Dominant | 0.148 | − 1452 | Dominant | |||
Utilization rates of long-term care services | 0.132 | − 909 | Dominant | 0.132 | − 1472 | Dominant | |||
Rehabilitation fee | 0.132 | − 689 | Dominant | 0.132 | − 1943 | Dominant | |||
Long-term care service fee | 0.132 | − 344 | Dominant | 0.132 | − 3885 | Dominant | |||
# of rehabilitation units per day | 0.132 | − 1654 | Dominant | 0.132 | − 1234 | Dominant | |||
Time horizon (10 years) | 0.20 | − 1565 | Dominant |