From: Cost-effectiveness of seven-days-per-week rehabilitation schedule for acute stroke patients
Parameters | Lower case | Base case | Upper case | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity analysis | ||||
Efficacy of the intervention (mRS distribution at 90 days) | mRS0-2:mRS3-5:mRS6 = 45.0%:51.1%:3.9% | mRS0-2:mRS3-5:mRS6 = 49,3%:46,7%:3.9% | mRS0-2:mRS3-5:mRS6 = 53.8%:42.2%:3.9% | [10] |
mRS distribution for severe patients (mRS3-5) | mRS3:4:5 = 100%:0%:0% | mRS3:4:5 = 30.5%:29.8%:39.6% | mRS3:4:5 = 0%:0%:100% | |
mRS distribution for non-severe patients (mRS0-2) | mRS0:1:2 = 100%:0%:0% | mRS0:1:2 = 30.5%:29.8%:39.6% | mRS0:1:2 = 0%:0%:100% | |
Utilization rates of long-term care services | − 10% from base case | Shown in Table 1 | + 10% from base case | |
Rehabilitation fees | − 50% from base case | + 100% from base case | ||
Long-term care fees | − 50% from base case | + 100% from base case | ||
# of rehabilitation units per day | 1 units | 4.3 units | 9 units | |
Scenario analysis | ||||
Discount rate (%/year) | 0 | 2 | 4 | [11] |
Time horizon | 10 years | 5 years |