Skip to main content

Table 1 Base-case inputs of parameters (probabilities and costs) for the model, their candidate distributions, and alpha–beta values characterizing those distributions (Manhiça District, Mozambique)

From: Costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV counselling and testing modalities in Southern Mozambique

Model inputs

PICT

HBT

VCT

Distributiona

Alpha-Betab

Source

Probabilitiesc

 Individual reached

–

0.752

–

β

8192–2705 (HBT)

[12]

 Not known HIV-positive/not pregnant

–

0.822

–

β

6736–1456 (HBT)

[12]

 Gave consentd

–

0.760

–

β

5116–1620 (HBT)

[12]

 HIV test positive

0.312

0.072

0.119

β

1046–2305 (PICT); 369–4747 (HBT); 909–6718 (VCT)

[12]

 Enrolled in study

0.404

–

0.363

β

423–623 (PICT); 330–579 (VCT)

 

 Enrolled in care

0.908

0.355

0.985

β

384–39 (PICT); 131–238 (HBT); 325–5 (VCT)

[12]

 Attended 1st consultation

0.799

0.901

0.911

β

307–77 (PICT); 118–13 (HBT); 296–29 (VCT)

[12]

 Linked to care

0.642

0.746

0.693

β

197–110 (PICT); 88–30 (HBT); 205–91 (VCT)

[12]

Costse

 Average cost per test (SD), US$

7.14 (1.30)

11.07 (3.82)

7.79 (1.30)

γ

30.3–0.235 (PICT); 8.39–1.32 (HBT); 36.1–0.216 (VCT)

Table 2

  1. aCandidate distribution were determined based on expert opinion and other similer studies
  2. bAlpha-Beta values were dependent on the type of candidate distribution. For β distribution, alpha = number of people reaching that step while beta = total number of people who completed previous step – alpha. For γ distribution, alpha = \(\frac{{\mu^{2} }}{{s^{2} }}\) while beta = \(\frac{{s^{2} }}{\mu \prime }\) where μ is the mean and s2 is the variance
  3. cThese were conditional probabilities derived directly from proportions of individuals reaching each step over the number of individuals completing the previous step, as described in the cohort study
  4. dThe probability of giving consent to be tested is a proxy to HBT uptake. Moreover, step downstream are conditional on successfully obtaining consent
  5. eAverage costs per person tested determined for each strategy from the micro-costing analysis were fed into the model. These were assumed to be equivalent to the average cost per test
  6. PICT provider-initiated counselling and testing, HBT home-based testing, VCT voluntary counselling and testing, SD standard deviation