Skip to main content

Table 4 Time-variant falls risk factors and determinants of background health state utility and care cost progressions in non-binary models with horizons longer than 5 years

From: Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models

Study labela

Time-variant falls risk factors

Backgroundb health/cost determinants

Age

Falls incidence

Other

Health state utility

Comorbidity care cost

Cohort-level Markov modelsc

 Boyd et al. (2020)

Tunnel state?d

MA fall

 

Agee

Agee

 Church et al. (2011, 2012)

Tunnel state?

Any fall

 

Agef

 

 Deverall et al. (2018)

Tunnel state?

MA fall

 

Agee

Agee

 Eldridge et al. (2005)

Tunnel state?

Fracture

FoF

Unclearf

Post-fractureg

 Farag et al. (2015)

Tunnel state?

Any fall

 

Agef

 

 Honkanen et al. (2006)

Tunnel state?

Hip fracture

FS

Agee; FS; LTC; post-hip fracture

FS; LTC

 Johansson et al. (2008)

Tunnel state?

Hip fracture

 

Agee,f

Age

 Moriarty et al. (2019)

Tunnel state?

MA fall, Hip fracture

 

Agef

 

 OMAS (2008)

Tunnel state?

MA fall

 

CEA

 

 Pega et al. (2016)

Tunnel state?

MA fall

 

Agee

Agee

 RCN (2005)

Tunnel state?

  

Age

 

 Wilson et al. (2017)

Tunnel state?

MA fall

 

Agee

Agee

Individual-level Markov models

 Hiligsmann et al. (2014)

×

  

Post-hip and vertebral fractures

Post-hip fractureg

 Mori et al. (2017)

×

Fracture

Osteoporosis

Age; post-hip and vertebral fractures

Post-hip fractureg

 Nshimyumukiza et al. (2013)

×

Fracture

BMD

Post-hip and vertebral fractures

 

 Zarca et al. (2014)

×

Hip fracture

Vitamin D

Age; post-hip fracture

 
  1. BMD bone mass density, CEA cost-effectiveness analysis, FoF fear of falling, FS functional status, LTC long-term care, MA fall fall requiring medical attention, OMAS Ontario Medical Advisory Secretariat, RCN Royal College of Nursing
  2. aSee Table 1 for study references
  3. bNot directed related to but indirectly influenced by falls/fractures: e.g., fatal fall influences lifetime comorbidity care costs
  4. cAlhambra-Borras et al. [146] was excluded due to unclear description of the dynamic model states following intervention
  5. dAge-based risk progression would require tunnel states but this was not mentioned or graphed, hence the question mark
  6. eStratified by further time-invariant factors including sex and ethnicity
  7. fUnclear whether events such as fracture and LTC admission incurred a one-off or permanent health utility loss
  8. gIncorporated ongoing care costs for serious fractures, which are not technically comorbidity care costs since they are directly associated with fall/fracture in model; but they can be interpreted as such given their permanent nature