Skip to main content

Table 2 Assumptions used for assembling the different benefits packages

From: Supporting a review of the benefits package of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana

Package

Primary goal

Co-payments for interventions included in package

Population coverage for interventions included in package

Best buys

Maximise value for money

No

100%

Status quo

Include high number of interventions

No

60%

Primary care

Include only primary care interventions

No

100%

Coinsurance—community care

Add co-insurance (for interventions that cannot be provided at community level by community health workers)

– No co-payments for community-level interventions

– 50% coinsurance (with a cap at GH₵1,000) for interventions that are not provided at community-level

– 100% for interventions without coinsurance

– 86% for interventions with coinsurance*

Coinsurance—budget

Add co-insurance (for interventions with high budget impact)

– No co-payments for interventions with budget impact < GH₵50 million

– 50% coinsurance (with a cap at GH₵1,000) for interventions with budget impact ≥ GH₵50 million

– 100% for interventions without coinsurance

– 86% for interventions with coinsurance*

  1. *This figure is based on experimental research by Manning et al. [25], in which healthcare demand under a free healthcare plan is compared to healthcare demand under a 50% coinsurance plan.