Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of results

From: Optimal strategies to screen health care workers for COVID-19 in the US: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Clinical status

Base case result

Uncertainty

Early clinical period, days 1–7

Only PCR, dominant

PCR testing is 74% likely to save QALYs but only 26% likely to save costs due to variations in test sensitivities

Early clinical period, days 8–14

Only PCR, $34,000/QALY gained

PCR-only is 34% likely to be dominant over Ag testing, if transmissible infection persists into second week post-symptom onset. As this duration decreases, cost-effectiveness of PCR testing also decreases, but remains below $180,000/QALY gained with 50% likelihood

Late clinical period

No test, dominant

No other testing strategy is cost-effective. The magnitude of ICERs depend on QALYs lost per infection and transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2

Asymptomatic

Only Ag, dominant

25% likelihood of being cost-effective (rather than dominant), depending on prevalence of transmissible infection among asymptomatic HCWs and medical costs

  1. Ag antigen, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, PCR polymerase chain reaction, QALY quality-adjusted life year