Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the review

From: Patients’ preferences for antiretroviral therapy service provision: a systematic review

Author

Aim of study

Publication year

Country

Type of study

Sample

Sampling method

Method of data collection

Method of data analysis

Zanolini [40]

To quantify preferences for a number of potential clinic improvements to enhance retention

2018

Zambia

Quantitative

385 adult HIV patients who were lost to follow-up

Random

Tablet-based interview

Mixed logit

Opuni [36]

To measure preferences for characteristics of hypothetical ART clinics

2010

South Africa

Quantitative

510 adult HIV-infected patients

Not stated clearly

Interview

Random intercept logit model

Tanle [39]

To examine the preferences of PLHIVs concerning ART services

2017

Ghana

Qualitative

145 FGDs and 171 IDIs PLWHIV

Volunteer

FGD and IDI

Thematic analysis

Rabkin [37]

To explore treatment preferences of PLHIV

2020

Zimbabwe

Mixed methods

35 KIIs, 8 FGDs, and 500 survey participants

Purposive sampling of KIIs and convenience sample of FGD and survey participants

KII and FGD, and tablet-based interview

Framework analysis and Fixed effects logit model

Strauss [38]

To assess patient preferences for differentiated HIV treatment delivery model characteristics

2020

Zimbabwe

Quantitative

500 stable adults on ART

Purposive

Tablet-based interview

Mixed-effects logit

Muiruri [35]

To understand preferences for ART packaging

2020

Tanzania

Qualitative

16 adult PLWHIV receiving HIV care

Purposive

In-depth interview

Thematic analysis

Eshun [34]

To determine what DSD features stable patients on ART most prefer

2019

Zambia

Quantitative

486 adult HIV patients on ART

Random

Tablet-based interview

Mixed logit

Mühlbacher [54]

To explore patient preferences regarding treatment of HIV/ AIDS

2013

Germany

Quantitative

218 HIV patients

Not stated

Self-administered online or offline

Random effect logit model

Lloyd [52]

To elicit patient and physician preferences for HIV treatment options

2013

United Kingdom

Quantitative

200 HIV patients

Not stated

Online self-administered

Conditional logit model

Fuster [51]

To determine HIV patients’ ratings of the characteristics of combined antiretroviral treatment

2015

Spain

Quantitative

602 HIV patients attending external consultations in HIV clinics

Casual or incidental non-probabilistic sampling

Self-administered questionnaire

Exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and Student’s t-test for independent samples

Brégigeon [50]

To elicit patient preferences regarding the principal characteristics of ARV therapies and to explore satisfaction of PLWH with their current ARV therapies

2017

France

Mixed methods

Adult patients taking ART:101 PLWH took part in the quantitative and 31 in the qualitative part

Consecutive

Quantitative interview and IDI

Mixed logit

and thematic analysis

Moyle[53]

To assess the needs of persons living with HIV regarding ART and to investigate the obstacles currently experienced by European patients when taking or commencing therapy

2003

France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK

Quantitative

504 people with HIV

Posters at HIV specialist care centers and through advertisements in patient-oriented magazines, newspapers, and charities

Interview

Descriptive

Beusterien [41]

To quantify the relative importance of new generation, third-agent HIV drug attributes based on their severity and levels of risk

2005

USA

Quantitative

42 adult HIV-positive individuals

Newspaper advertisement

Computer-administered

Ordinary least squares regression

Miller [45]

To assess patients preferences for different aspects of antiretroviral regimens

2002

USA

Mixed methods

47 FGD among adult HIV patients on ART and 62 patients for quantitative interview

Consecutive

FGD and quantitative interview

Graded pair-preferences method for the quantitative part but not stated for the qualitative part

Eaton [42]

To understand patient preferences for contemporary antiretroviral therapy

2017

USA

Qualitative

28 PLWH >  = 19 years old who initiated ART on January 1, 2006

Using flyers, staff referrals, and electronic screens

Nominal group technique

Multi-voting technique

Yelverton [49]

To identify ART characteristics that are important to patients and understand considerations in ART selection from both patient and provider perspectives

2018

USA

Mixed methods

Adult HIV infected individuals on ART: 16 IDIs and 26 for ranking tasks

Patients were recruited by their attending physician, word of mouth, and clinic advertisements

In-depth interviews (IDIs) with HIV patients for the qualitative part and Ranking tasks

Content analysis(qualitative) and count analysis(quantitative)

Sherer [47]

To evaluate the importance of ART attributes

2005

USA

Quantitative

387 adult HIV-positive patients who were currently receiving or had previously received ART

Convenience sampling using flyers

Interview

Paired sample t-tests

Ostermann [46]

To quantify patients’ preferences for key characteristics of modern ART

2020

USA

Quantitative

263 adult PLWH

Flyers and invitation cards; referrals from providers, patients, and members of a community advisory board; and recruitment of patients after clinic appointments

Interview

Mixed logit

Sijstermans [48]

To assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in an urban Colombian population

2020

Colombia

Quantitative

224 HIV patients

All patients with HIV in a single City

Self-administered questionnaire

Mixed multinomial logit

Goossens [23]

To elicit patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the rural population of Colombia

2020

Colombia

Quantitative

148 HIV patients

All patients with HIV in a single City

Self-administered

Mixed logit model

Hendriks [44]

To elicit patients’ preferences for HIV/AIDS treatment characteristics in Colombia

2018

Colombia

Quantitative

283 People living with HIV/AIDS

Not clearly stated

Self-administered questionnaire

Hierarchical Bayes method

Hauber [43]

To estimate the willingness of HIV-positive African American subjects who have chosen not to start ART to accept risks of acute AEs with known outcomes and long-term AEs with uncertain outcomes in exchange for virologic suppression

2009

USA

Quantitative

158 adult HIV-positive but ART-naive individuals

Convenience sampling

Not clearly stated

Mixed-logit

Beusterien [55]

To assess patient preferences for attributes associated with third agent HIV medications

2007

USA and Germany

Quantitative

323 HIV-positive individuals

Advertisements in an electronic newsletter and newspapers and through HIV clinics

Computerized

Ordinary least squares regression