Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality scoring using the CHEERS criteria

From: Cost-utility analysis in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing kidney transplant; what pays? A systematic review

 

CHEERS criterion

CUA of transplanting infectious kidneys (n = 03)

CUA of kidney allocation policies (n = 09)

CUA of technology used in KT (n = 04)

Total (%) (n = 16)

1

Title

1

4

3

8 (50.0)

2

Abstract

1

5

3

9 (56.3)

3

Background and objectives

3

9

4

16 (100.0)

4

Target population and subgroups

3

9

4

16 (100.0)

5

Setting and location

2

9

3

14 (87.5)

6

Study perspective

2

8

4

14 (87.5)

7

Comparators

3

9

4

16 (100.0)

8

Time horizon

3

7

4

14 (87.5)

9

Discount rate

3

9

4

16 (100.0)

10

Choice of health outcomes

3

9

2

14 (87.5)

11

Measurement of effectiveness

2

9

4

15 (93.8)

12

Measurement and valuation of preference-based outcomes

NA

1a

NA

01 (100.0)

13

Estimating resources and costs

1

9

4

14 (87.5)

14

Currency, price date, and conversion

2

8

4

14 (87.5)

15

Choice of model

2

7

3

12 (75.0)

16

Assumptions

3

5

2

10 (62.5)

17

Analytical methods

0

5

0

05 (31.3)

18

Study parameters

2

6

4

12 (75.0)

19

Incremental costs and outcomes

3

8

3

14 (87.5)

20

Characterising uncertainty

3

8

4

15 (93.8)

21

Characterising heterogeneity

0

2

0

02 (12.5)

22

Study findings, limitations, generalisability, and current knowledge

2

7

4

13 (81.3)

23

Source of funding

1

7

2

10 (62.5)

24

Conflicts of interest

1

5

2

08 (50.0)

  1. NA not applicable
  2. aApplicable only to one study