Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate sensitivity analysis: when the cost per NIPT is €150 or €76

From: The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free foetal DNA for the detection of Down syndrome in the Spanish National Health Service: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Screening strategy

1st and 2nd trimester screening (current screening)

NIPT as contingent testing

NIPT as first-line testing

Effectiveness

No of women undergoing 1st and 2nd trimester screening tests

66,799

66,799

1336

No of women undergoing NIPT

0

3152

66,799

No of NIPT with a positive result

0

251

280

No of ITa

3275

579

700

No of procedure-related miscarriages

23

4

5

No of T21 cases detected

271

269

296

Costs

1st and 2nd trimester screening tests

€5,292,716

€5,292,716

€101,536

NIPT = €150

€0

€491,550

€10,940,400

NIPT = €76

€0

€249,052

€5,543,136

IT

€3,093,565

€546,923

€661,220

Hospitalisation due to amniotic fluid leakage and pregnancy termination owing to T21

€515,591

€469,362

€518,389

Total costs when NIPT = €150

€8,901,872

€6,800,551

€12,221,545

Total costs when NIPT = €76

€8,901,872

€6,558,053

€6,824,281

Economic analysis

NIPT as first-line testing vs 1st and 2nd trimester screening

NIPT as contingent testing vs 1st and 2nd trimester screening

NIPT as first-line testing vs NIPT as contingent testing

Incremental cost when TPNI = €150

€3,319,673

€− 2,101,321

€5,420,994

Incremental cost when TPNI = €76

€− 2,077,591

€− 2,343,819

€266,228

Incremental effectiveness (T21 extra cases detected)

25

− 2

27

ICER (€/case T21 extra detected) when NIPT = €150

132,787

200,777

ICER (€/case T21 extra detected) when NIPT = €76

Dominant

9860

  1. ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; IT, invasive tests, NIPT: non-invasive prenatal testing; T21, trisomy 21
  2. aOut of the total of the total number of invasive diagnostic tests performed, 271 correspond to pregnant women with a NT ≥ 3.5 mm (considered high-risk)