Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of studies with Drummond’s checklist and UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) quality criteria

From: Primary and secondary prevention interventions for cardiovascular disease in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of economic evaluations

Author, publication year

Drummond score

NICE quality rating

Risk of bias

Permanicha et al. 2015

24/35

+

Moderate

Anderson et al. 2000

15/35

−

High

Mason et al. 2014

29/35

++

Low

Donaldson et al. 2011

25/35

+

Moderate

Yan et al. 2015

17/35

−

High

Bautista et al. 2013

24/35

+

Moderate

Anderson et al. 2000

21/35

+

Moderate

Basu et al. 2016

29/35

++

Low

Khonputsa et al. 2012

28/35

++

Low

Rabus et al. 2005

22/35

+

Moderate

Gaziano et al. 2006

27/35

++

Low

Gaziano et al. 2015

26/35

+

Moderate

Li et al. 2015

31/35

++

Low

Ortegon et al. 2012

29/35

++

Low

Permsuwan et al. 2015

28/35

++

Low

Ha et al. 2011

30/35

++

Low

Schulman-Marcus et al. 2010

28/35

++

Low

Jafar et al. 2011

29/35

++

Low

Choosakulchart et al. 2013

28/35

++

Low

Lakic et al. 2012

20/35

+

Moderate

Pan et al. 2014

29/35

++

Low

Wilcox et al. 2015

26/35

+

Moderate

Gaziano et al. 2005

27/35

++

Low

Amirsadri and Hassani 2015

31/35

++

Low

Wu et al. 2014

28/35

++

Low

Mejia et al. 2015

25/35

+

Moderate

Salomon et al. 2012

27/35

++

Low

Gu et al. 2015

29/35

++

Low

Nguyen et al. 2016

29/35

++

Low

Davies et al. 2013

24/35

+

Moderate

Jarungsuccess et al. 2014

23/35

+

Moderate

Wang et al. 2013

23/35

+

Moderate

Robberstad et al. 2007

26/35

+

Moderate

Ngalesoni FN et al. 2016

28/35

++

Low

Tolla et al. 2016

27/35

++

Low

Rubinstein et al. 2010

27/35

++

Low

Basu et al. 2015

26/35

+

Moderate

Rosendaal et al. 2010

28/35

++

Low

Ekwunife et al. 2013

27/35

++

Low

Amirsadri and Sedighi 2017

29/35

++

Low

Wang et al. 2017

15/35

−

High

Polanczyk et al. 2007

22/35

+

Moderate

Garcia-Pena et al. 2002

21/35

+

Moderate

Ribeiro et al. 2010

28/35

++

Low

Araujo et al. 2008

21/35

+

Moderate

Araujo et al. 2007

24/35

+

Moderate

Murray et al. 2003

25/35

+

Moderate

Akkazieva et al. 2009

21/35

+

Moderate

Gonzalez-Diaz et al. 2015

26/35

+

Moderate

Huang and Ren 2010

13/35

−

High

  1. Drummond summary score: ≥ 27/35 (75%) = ‘++’, 18–26/35 (50–75%) = ‘+’, score < 18/35 (< 50%) = ‘−’