Skip to main content

Table 9 Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of HPV vaccination plus cervical cancer screening compared to cervical cancer screening alone: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of HPV vaccination without taking into account economies of scale and cervical cancer screening with applying economies of scale

From: Incorporating economies of scale in the cost estimation in economic evaluation of PCV and HPV vaccination programmes in the Philippines: a game changer?

ICER (USD/QALY)

Percent coverage of screening (with EoS approach)

Percent coverage of HPV vaccine (not taking into account EoS approach)

 

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

10

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

20

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

30

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

40

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

50

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

60

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

70

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

80

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

90

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

100

− 30a

120b

280b

440b

600b

770b

950b

1120b

1300b

1480b

  1. ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, EoS economies of scale, HPV human papillomavirus vaccine
  2. aCost-effective
  3. bCost-ineffective