Skip to main content

Table 8 Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of HPV vaccination plus cervical cancer screening compared to cervical cancer screening alone: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of HPV vaccination with applying economies of scale and cervical cancer screening without taking into account economies of scale

From: Incorporating economies of scale in the cost estimation in economic evaluation of PCV and HPV vaccination programmes in the Philippines: a game changer?

ICER (USD/QALY)

Percent coverage of screening (not taking into account EoS approach)

Percent coverage of HPV vaccine (with EoS approach)

 

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

10

− 30a

120b

270b

440b

600b

770b

940b

1120b

1300b

1480b

20

− 470a

− 330a

− 190a

− 50a

100b

250b

400b

560b

720b

880b

30

− 820a

− 690a

− 570a

− 440a

− 310a

− 170a

− 40a

110b

250b

400b

40

− 1140a

− 1040a

− 920a

− 810a

− 690a

− 570a

− 450a

− 320a

− 190a

− 60a

50

− 1460a

− 1370a

− 1270a

− 1170a

− 1060a

− 960a

− 850a

− 740a

− 620a

− 510a

60

− 1780a

− 1700a

− 1610a

− 1520a

− 1430a

− 1340a

− 1240a

− 1150a

− 1050a

− 950a

70

− 2090a

− 2020a

− 1950a

− 1870a

− 1800a

− 1720a

− 1640a

− 1550a

− 1470a

− 1380a

80

− 2410a

− 2350a

− 2290a

− 2220a

− 2160a

− 2100a

− 2030a

− 1960a

− 1890a

− 1820a

90

− 2720a

− 2670a

− 2620a

− 2570a

− 2520a

− 2470a

− 2420a

− 2360a

− 2310a

− 2250a

100

− 3030a

− 2990a

− 2960a

− 2920a

− 2880a

− 2850a

− 2810a

− 2770a

− 2720a

− 2680a

  1. ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, EoS economies of scale, HPV human papillomavirus vaccine
  2. aCost-effective
  3. bCost-ineffective