Skip to main content

Table 13 Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of HPV vaccination alone compared to cervical cancer screening alone: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of HPV vaccination without taking into account economies of scale and cervical cancer screening with applying economies of scale

From: Incorporating economies of scale in the cost estimation in economic evaluation of PCV and HPV vaccination programmes in the Philippines: a game changer?

ICER (USD/QALY)

Percent coverage of screening (with EoS approach)

Percent coverage of HPV vaccine (not taking into account EoS approach)

% coverage

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

10

− 310a

− 11450a

− 2230a

− 2620a

− 2760a

− 1960a

− 2150a

− 1640a

− 1790a

− 1910a

20

− 220a

1730b

4100c

− 15970a

− 6660a

− 3550a

− 3410a

− 2380a

− 2480a

− 2540a

30

− 200a

700b

860b

3350c

12580c

− 31670a

− 9250a

− 4670a

− 4180a

− 3910a

40

− 200a

390b

410b

1410b

3030c

4100c

11030c

119470c

− 15490a

− 9070a

50

− 190a

240b

230b

840b

1660b

1820b

3280c

3990c

8180c

22910c

60

− 190a

150b

140b

570b

1110b

1130b

1870b

1940b

3100c

4840c

70

− 190a

100b

80b

420b

810b

790b

1270b

1240b

1860b

2630b

80

− 190a

60b

40b

310b

620b

590b

940b

890b

1300b

1780b

90

− 190a

30b

10b

240b

500b

460b

740b

680b

980b

1320b

100

− 190a

0b

− 20b

190b

400b

370b

600b

530b

780b

1030b

  1. ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; EoS economies of scale; HPV human papillomavirus vaccine
  2. aCost-effective
  3. bCost-ineffective
  4. cHighly cost-ineffective