Skip to main content

Table 3 Methodological characteristics of the included studies

From: Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations

Authors

Unit costs

Type of economic evaluation

Model

Model assumptions

Perspective

Time horizon

Discount rate (%)

Alberts et al. [36]

$, 2014

CUA

DAM, decision tree, Markov model

(a) In the absence of RCTs data, relative risk reduction was set according to the NCCN guidelines

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime

3

Barone et al. [34]

€, 2012

CUA

DAM

(a) The level of risk of developing metastatic disease was set at the level of 1 patients out of 2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5 and 1/10

Healthcare system perspective

NR

NR

Barzi et al. [17]

$, NR

CEA

Decision tree, Markov model

(a) The first-degree relatives of probands were considered as the healty individuals affected with LS who would be offered preventive measures

Societal perspective

Lifetime

NR

Behl et al. [33]

$, 2010

CEA

Markov model

(a) The difference in survivals among alternatives and the referent strategy (1) depends exclusively on a lack of response to (1)

Healthcare system perspective

10 years

3

Blank et al. [31]

€, 2010

CUA

Markov model

(a) A high number of assumptions related to the composition of the patient population

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime

3

Dinh et al. [27]

$, 2009

CUA

Cohort simulation model

(a) Single-site testing only offered to FDRs of probands

Societal perspective

NR

3

Gallego et al. [18]

$, 2014

CUA

Decision tree

(a) Assumptions relying on the population involved in the model. Firstly, only FDRs have been considered, then universal screening has been evaluated

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime

3

Gausachs et al. [19]

€, NR

CEA

Decision tree

(a) Assumptions related to the prevalence of germline mutation

Healthcare system perspective

NR

NR

Gould-Suarez et al. [20]

$, NR

CEA

Decision tree

Assumptions on the estimated model such as on the baseline prevalence of LS and other factors. All values were derived from published literature

Healthcare system perspective

NR

NR

Gudgeon et al. [21]

$, 2010

CEA

DAM

Assumptions on the estimated model such as on the baseline prevalence of LS and other factors. All values were derived from published literature

Healthcare system perspective

NR

NR

Ladabaum et al. [28]

$, 2010

CEA

Decision tree with Markov subtrees

Assumptions on the estimated model such as on the baseline prevalence of LS and other factors. All values were derived from published literature

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime (or 100 years)

3

Leenen et al. [22]

€, 2013

CEA

DAM

(a) Assumptions made on uncertain parameters such as CRC risk for LS carriers, the method and risk reduction of LS surveillance and assumed adherence to LS surveillance programs

Healthcare system perspective

NR

3

Severin et al. [23]

€, 2012

CEA

DAM, decision tree, Markov model

Assumptions on the estimated model such as on the baseline prevalence of LS and other factors. All values were derived from published literature

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime (or 120 years)

3

Sie et al. [24]

€, 2013

CEA

DAM, decision tree, Markov chain analysis

Assumptions on the estimated model such as on the baseline prevalence of LS and other factors. All values were derived from published literature

Healthcare system perspective

30 years

4

Snowsill et al. [26]

£, 2013/14

CUA

DAM, decision tree

(a) In the absence of RCTs data, estimates were sought from clinical experts

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime (or 100 years)

3.5

Snowsill et al. [25]

£, 2013–14

CUA

Decision tree, individual patient simulation model

The rate of acceptance of a test was independent of any previous tests, and acceptance of one genetic test implied acceptance of all genetic testing

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime

3.5

Vijayaraghavan et al. [32]

$ and €, 2009

CEA

Markov model

(a) Patients with KRAS mutant tumors received no benefit from EGFR inhibitors; (b) patients with KRAS mutant tumors received some benefit from combination therapy containing FOLFIRI or irinotecan; (c) KRAS mutation testing has a sentitivity of 95% and a specifity of 100%; (d) effectivess of cetuximab + FOLFIRI was equivalent to the effectiveness of cetuximab + Irinotecan

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime

NR

Wang et al. [29]

$, 2010

CUA

DAM, Decision tree, Markov subtrees

Different clinical management programs and acceptance rates among probands and relatives until age 75 years based on their germline testing results and cancer risk were modeled

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime

3

Wang et al. [30]

SGD, 2010

CEA

DAM, Decision tree, Markov subtrees

Related to compliance rates

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime

3

Westwood et al. [35]

£, 2011

CUA

Decision tree, Markov model

(a) Assumption of equal prognostic value analysis for all tests for which information on technical performance was available from the online survey; (b) the differences between the outcomes of evaluated trials are exclusively caused by the different tests used; (c) test accuracy based on objective response can be compared with accuracy based on resection rates

Healthcare system perspective

Lifetime

3.5

  1. DAM decision analytic model, NR not reported, RCTs randomized clinical trials, NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network, LS Lynch syndrome, FDRs first-degree-relatives, CRC colorectal cancer, CEA cost-effectiveness analysis, CUA cost-utility analysis