Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of results pertaining to processes of care

From: Advancing aged care: a systematic review of economic evaluations of workforce structures and care processes in a residential care setting

Intervention

Source

Effectiveness

Cost

Randomised design

Key findings

Dementia-specific care

 Person-centred care (PCC) vs. usual care (UC)

 Person-centred environment (PCE) vs. UC

 Both (PCC + PCE) vs. UC

[39]

+

+

Unclear

+

+

+

Yes

Person-centred care has the potential to reduce agitation and aggression in residents living with dementia

Disparate implementation methods and mixed findings suggest a need for future research to examine the cost-effectiveness of person-centred care as well as different methods for assessing clinically-relevant quality of life

 PCC vs. UC

Dementia-care mapping (DCM) vs. UC

[31, 32]

+

+

+

+

Yes

 Dementia-care mapping (DCM) vs. usual care

[30]

0

0

Yes

 A.G.E. dementia care program (activities, medication guidelines, educational rounds) vs. usual care

[27]

+

+

Yes

For an additional cost, activity programs and psychiatric care can reduce behavioural symptoms, antipsychotic medications, and restraints, as well as increase activity participation rates for residents with dementia

Integrated care

 Multidisciplinary Integrated Care model vs. UC

[22]

Unclear

+

Yes

There is limited cost-saving potential for integrated care in nursing homes

If there was unmet care, a multidisciplinary integrated model could address this gap; however a trade-off must be made as to whether the additional benefit is worth the additional cost

 Integrated care vs. traditional care

[21]

NA

+

No

Quality improvement initiatives

 Advance Directive program vs. usual care

[25]

0

–

Yes

Activity programs aimed at reducing health care utilisation and hospitalisations have the potential to create cost savings from a broader health care perspective

 INTERACT II tools (interventions to reduce acute care transfers)

[43]

+

+

No

 Multifactorial fracture prevention program provided by a multidisciplinary team vs. no prevention in newly admitted nursing home residents

[33]

+

+

No

 Multilevel intervention with expert nurses vs. monthly info packs on ageing and physical assessment

[26]

+

+

Yes

It is possible for facilities in need of quality of care improvements to build the organisational capacity to improve while not increasing staffing or costs of care

  1. Effectiveness + intervention provides greater health benefit than comparator; 0 intervention provides equivalent health benefit to comparator; − intervention provides lower health benefit than comparator
  2. Cost + intervention costs are higher than comparator; 0 intervention costs are equal to comparator; − intervention costs are lower than comparator