Table 3 Quality index scores for studies included in the review
| Â | Study | Quality index decision based on % score |
|---|---|---|
1 | Adam et al. (2005) | Fair |
2 | Borghi et al. (2005) | High |
3 | Manasyan et al. (2011) | Fair |
4 | Bang et al. (2005) | Fair |
5 | Tripathy et al. (2004) | Fair |
6 | Lewycka et al. (2013) | Fair |
7 | Fottrell et al. (in Prost et al. 2013) | Fair |
8 | LeFevre et al. (2013) | High |
9 | Owusu-Edusei et al. (2011) | High |
10 | Sicuri et al. (2010) | High |
11 | Sabin et al. (2005) | High |
12 | Sayed et al. (2008) | Fair |
13 | Halperin et al. (2009) | Fair |
14 | John et al. (2008) | Fair |
15 | Robberstad and Ovjen-Olsen (2010) | High |
16 | Orlando et al. (2010) | Fair |
17 | Shah et al. (2011) | High |
18 | Maredza et al. (2013) | High |
19 | Binagwaho et al. (2013) | High |
20 | Hung et al. (2011) | High |
21 | Bomela et al. (2001) | Poor |
22 | Vickerman et al. (2006) | Fair |
23 | Hong et al. (2010) | High |
24 | Hounton et al. (2009) | High |
25 | Huang et al. (2012) | High |
26 | Darmstadt et al. (2007) | Fair |
27 | Fasawe et al. (2013) | High |