Table 4 Sensitivity analysis testing the probability that screening participation or invitation-to-screening is cost-effective
| Â | INMB | Probability cost-effective | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTP (€ per QALY) 30,000 | WTP (€ per QALY) 50,000 | WTP (€ per QALY) 30,000 | WTP (€ per QALY) 50,000 | |
Screening participation (group P vs. group C) | ||||
 Base-case | 368 | 959 | 0.79 | 0.89 |
 High prob of LC (p LC  = 6.79 %) | 609 | 1376 | 0.86 | 0.92 |
 Low prob of LC (p LC  = 4.2 %) | 160 | 600 | 0.67 | 0.84 |
 Alternative QoL | 134 | 568 | 0.63 | 0.80 |
 Higher costs | 265 | 856 | 0.72 | 0.87 |
Invitation-to-screening (group I vs. group C) | ||||
 Base-case | 365 | 692 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
 High prob of LC (p LC  = 4.73 %) | 438 | 816 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
 Low prob of LC (p LC  = 3.68 %) | 311 | 601 | 0.94 | 0.97 |
 Alternative QoL | 260 | 519 | 0.90 | 0.93 |
 Higher costs | 339 | 667 | 0.94 | 0.96 |