Skip to main content

Table 5 Parameter estimates for population-average model using robust regression with pweights

From: Is the value of a life or life-year saved context specific? Further evidence from a discrete choice experiment

Predictor

β

SE

z

Sig.

β

SE

z

Sig.

 

Lives saved

Life-years saved

Medical(B – A)

   

ns

   

ns

Cure(B – A)

-0.8476

0.110

-7.68

0.000

-0.8330

0.105

-7.93

0.000

AgeGrp_(B – A)†

  

χ2 = 130

0.000

  

χ2 = 28.9

0.000

AgeGrp1(B – A)†

1.2894

0.148

8.72

0.000

0.7448

0.144

5.17

0.000

AgeGrp2(B – A)†

0.5936

0.138

4.30

0.000

0.3001

0.132

2.28

0.023

AgeGrp4(B – A)†

-0.3810

0.110

-3.45

0.001

0.0187

0.130

0.14

0.886

Evidence(B – A)

0.6857

0.093

7.34

0.000

0.6572

0.093

7.05

0.000

Fault(B – A)

-0.5822

0.097

-5.98

0.000

-0.6560

0.104

-6.31

0.000

$Private(B – A)^

-0.0055

0.002

-2.49

0.013

-0.0077

0.002

-3.59

0.000

Effect(B – A)‡

0.0338

0.004

8.43

0.000

0.0006

0.000

7.53

0.000

$Cost(B – A)^

-0.0060

0.001

-4.50

0.000

-0.0057

0.001

-4.22

0.000

HlthCard*Q

-0.0456

0.018

-2.52

0.012

-0.0454

0.018

-2.51

0.012

SIEFA_Econ*Q/1000

0.0693

0.022

3.15

0.002

0.0794

0.022

3.58

0.000

(Constant)

-0.3415

0.118

-2.89

0.004

-0.3995

0.117

-3.43

0.001

    

N = 2329

   

N = 2329

    

Wald χ2 = 352.32, df = 11, p = 0.000

   

Wald χ2 = 346.91, df = 11, p = 0.000

    

Log-likelihood = -1234.69, Pseudo R2 = 0.2350

   

Log-likelihood = -1239.33, Pseudo R2 = 0.2321

  1. ^Dollar values expressed in AUD100,000s.
  2. †Reference category is 'working-age adults'. First, second and fourth dummies denote 'young children', 'young adults' and 'older-age retirees', respectively. Joint significance of dummies evaluated using Wald statistic on chi-square distribution.
  3. ‡Effect(B – A) gives the incremental effectiveness of profile B compared to profile A defined in terms of terms of lives saved for the 'lives-saved' model and life-years saved for the 'life-years saved' model.