Does productivity influence priority setting? A case study from the field of CVD prevention

Table 4 Treatment groups either excluded in the societal or health care sector perspective

Intervention	Sex and age	Risk profile	Gained QALYs	Societal perspective			Health care sector perspective
				Net costs, SEK	Cost/QALY	Included	Net costs, SEK	Cost/QALY	Included
A	M₄₀	5.0, 180	6	1	167	Yes	606	101000	No
B	M₄₀	S, 6.0, 150	90	434	4822	Yes	7947	88300	No
C	M₄₀	S, 7.5, 139	63	1045	16587	Yes	6451	102397	No
D	M₅₀	S, 5.0, 150	147	3036	20653	Yes	12194	82952	No
E	M₄₀	7.5, 150	68	1772	26059	Yes	7105	104485	No
F	M₅₀	S, 6.0, 139	346	13254	38306	Yes	32258	93231	No
G	M₅₀	6.0, 150	624	26209	42002	Yes	58805	94239	No
H	F₅₀	S,6.0,150	247	13257	53672	Yes	19661	79599	No
I	M₅₀	7.5, 139	227	12281	54101	Yes	23964	105568	No
A-I			1812	71289
J	F₆₀	7.5, 150	765	41964	54855	No	45451	59413	Yes
K	F₆₀	6.0,150	1541	105851	68690	No	112247	72841	Yes
L	F₆₀	S,6.0,139	235	16945	72106	No	18106	77047	Yes
J-L			2541	164760

ISSN: 1478-7547