Skip to main content

Table 4 Influence of selected assumptions and parameters on the level of cost-effectiveness ratios and the rank order of interventions by cost-effectiveness ratios as compared to baseline estimates

From: Setting priorities for the health care sector in Zimbabwe using cost-effectiveness analysis and estimates of the burden of disease

Assumption or

parameter investigated

Difference in costs per DALY

as compared to baseline

Difference in rank order

as compared to baseline

 

--------- change in percent ---------

------ places up or down ------

 

0–10

10–20

20–30

≥ 30

0–1

2–3

4–5

≥ 6

 

---- Number of interventions ----

---- Number of interventions ----

Discount rate 6%

55

0

4

6

47

13

3

2

Discount rate 10%

8

3

2

52

25

16

15

9

Zimbabwean life expectancies

20

38

3

4

57

7

1

0

Equal value on each life year

11

34

14

6

45

18

1

1

Capacity utilisation 80%

43

11

10

1

41

21

3

0

Capacity utilisation 95%

19

20

14

12

32

28

4

1

Effectiveness 90% of baseline

2

63

0

0

41

21

3

0

Effectiveness 70% of baseline

0

0

2

63

8

22

19

16

Effectiveness 50% of baseline

0

0

0

65

5

9

10

41

  1. Note: The median costs per DALY utilising an alternative assumption or parameter were compared to the median costs of Table 1. Likewise, the rank order of interventions by median cost-effectiveness ratios utilising an alternative assumption or parameter were compared to the rank order of Table 1.