Skip to main content

Table 3 Influence of changes in key input variables on cost-effectiveness ratio in US $ per patient successful treated

From: Cost and cost-effectiveness of community based and health facility based directly observed treatment of tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Input variable

Input value

Average CER community DOTa

Average CER health facility DOTa

 

Min.

Max.

Min.

Max.

Min.

Max.

Patient time lossb

0

US$0.29

117

130

168

203

Supporter time lossb

0

US $ 0.48

123

129

196

196

Discount rate

0

3%

125

125

186

188

Success rate(community DOT)c

69%

78%

136

120

  

Success rate (health facility DOT)c

62%

74%

  

281

235

Success rate(community DOT)d

81%

89%

116

106

  

Success rate (health facility DOT)d

79%

87%

  

184

167

  1. aThe sensitivity analyses are based on base-case calculations
  2. btime loss: minimum=assuming time is valued as zero; maximum= average income per hour among those with income only
  3. cSuccess rate taking in consideration cure rate in 'no treatment' scenario
  4. dSuccess rate without cure rate in 'no treatment' scenario