Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 5 Test for associations between responses to the three scenarios and the respondents' characteristics

From: Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda

Characteristics Odds ratios(confidence intervals)
  Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Age 0.94 (.47–1.88) 1.30 (.67–2.48) 1.17 (.67–2.03)
Designation 1.99 (.56–7.12) 0.24 (.05–1.08) 1.91 (.86–4.28)
Level of work 0.77 (.29–2.04) 1.43 (.57–3.61) 1.12 (.56–2.23)
Respondent consider priority setting as part of there work 0.82 (.22–3.10) 1.53 (.44–5.30) 0.55 (.13–2.20)
  1. Reference categories: Age =<35 years; Designation = health worker Respondent consider priority setting as part of their duty Level of work = Respondent works at national level