Skip to main content

Table 1 The effect of weighting technique on rank order of criteria and weight differences between criteria

From: Does technique matter; a pilot study exploring weighting techniques for a multi-criteria decision support framework

Characteristics

Five point rating scale (n = 60)

Five point rating (hierarchical) (n = 15)

Point allocation (hierarchical) (n = 15)

Ranking (n = 15)

Pairwise comparison (hierarchical) (n = 15)

Best worst scaling (n = 15)

Criteria rank order (mean group weight)

      

1st

D2

0.100

D1

0.087

D1

0.092

D1

0.095

D2

0.118

D2

0.091

2nd

D1

0.089

Q1

0.086

I3

0.089

C2

0.088

D1

0.111

I1

0.090

3rd

I3

0.085

T1

0.083

D2

0.084

I3

0.086

I3

0.110

D1

0.089

4th

I1

0.080

D2

0.082

C2

0.082

Q1

0.083

C2

0.083

I3

0.083

5th

Q2

0.076

Q2

0.077

Q1

0.078

D2

0.080

T1

0.082

T1

0.078

6th

T1

0.075

C2

0.076

I1

0.077

I1

0.078

I1

0.071

E1

0.077

7th

C2

0.072

T2

0.070

E3

0.070

E3

0.077

Q2

0.060

E2

0.074

8th

Q1

0.069

I3

0.070

E2

0.068

Q2

0.069

I2

0.056

I2

0.073

9th

E2

0.066

I1

0.067

Q2

0.065

E2

0.065

Q1

0.056

E3

0.069

10th

I2

0.065

C1

0.063

E1

0.062

E1

0.063

C1

0.054

C2

0.064

11th

E1

0.061

E2

0.062

I2

0.060

C1

0.056

E1

0.054

Q1

0.057

12th

E3

0.057

E1

0.062

T1

0.059

I2

0.055

T2

0.052

T2

0.056

13th

T2

0.057

E3

0.061

T2

0.058

T1

0.053

E2

0.049

Q2

0.054

14th

C1

0.052

I2

0.053

C1

0.056

T2

0.053

E3

0.044

C1

0.046

Weight difference

      

1st-3rd*

0.027 (0.04)

0.009 (0.01)

0.030 (0.03)

0.034 (0.03)

0.075 (0.10)

0.017 (0.02)

Most-least**

0.091 (0.07)

0.064 (0.02)

0.100 (0.05)

0.110 (0.05)

0.156 (0.12)

0.076 (0.02)

Equal weights***

0.022 (0.01)

0.017 (0.01)

0.027 (0.01)

0.027 (0.01)

0.034 (0.02)

0.018 (0.01)

Rank difference

Group ranks

#

2.8 (2.8)

2.0 (1.8)

2.5 (2.1)

1.6 (1.4)

2.3 (2.1)

Individual ranks

#

7.5 (1.7)

7.6 (2.6)

7.8 (3.5)

8.3 (1.9)

6.2 (2.5)

Correlation

Mean across-respondents

##

0.83

0.83

0.71

0.78

0.97

Mean within-respondents

##

0.53

0.50

0.43

0.45

0.66

  1. *Within respondent difference between the weight of the first and third ranked criteria (group mean and standard deviation). **Within respondent difference between the weight of the first and last ranked criteria (group mean and standard deviation). ***Within respondent difference between weights elicited with the technique and equal weights for all criteria (mean and standard deviation). # rank order based on five point weighting scale (nH) criteria ordering is the reference ranking. ## weights of five point rating scale (nH) is the reference weight. Criteria abbreviations: D1: Disease severity, D2: Size of population, I1: Improvement of efficacy/effectiveness, I2: Improvement of safety/tolerability, I3: Improvement of patient-reported outcomes, Q1: Completeness and consistency of reporting evidence, Q2: Relevance and validity of evidence, C1: Clinical guidelines, C2: Comparative interventions limitations, T1: Public health interest, T2: Type of medical service, E1: Budget impact on health plan, E2: Cost-effectiveness of intervention, E3: Impact on other spending.