Table 5 Model input parameter values and ranges

Effectiveness measures:

LIG: Probability of HDDS being in upper tertile

44.1%

33.1%

55.2%

Evaluation data [20]

Worst case: -25% of the base case

Best case: +25% of the base case

Comparator: Probability of HDDS being in upper tertile

32.8%

24.6%

41.0%

Evaluation data [20]

Worst case: -25% of the base case

Best case: +25% of the base case

LIG: Probability of FCS being "acceptable" (>35)

59.1%

44.3%

73.8%

Evaluation data [20]

Worst case: -25% of the base case

Best case: +25% of the base case

Comparator: Probability of FCS being "acceptable" (>35)

42.0%

31.5%

52.5%

Evaluation data [20]

Worst case: -25% of the base case

Best case: +25% of the base case

Costs per household (EUR):

Incremental costs per household in LIG program (societal perspective)

1,415

1,769

1,061

Incremental cost per household (Table  4)

Worst case: +25% of the base case

Best case: -25% of the base case