Skip to main content

Table 5 Model input parameter values and ranges

From: Cost-effectiveness of community vegetable gardens for people living with HIV in Zimbabwe

Parameter Base case Worst case Best case Source of base case (and range)
Effectiveness measures:
LIG: Probability of HDDS being in upper tertile 44.1% 33.1% 55.2% Evaluation data [20]
Worst case: -25% of the base case
Best case: +25% of the base case
Comparator: Probability of HDDS being in upper tertile 32.8% 24.6% 41.0% Evaluation data [20]
Worst case: -25% of the base case
Best case: +25% of the base case
LIG: Probability of FCS being "acceptable" (>35) 59.1% 44.3% 73.8% Evaluation data [20]
Worst case: -25% of the base case
Best case: +25% of the base case
Comparator: Probability of FCS being "acceptable" (>35) 42.0% 31.5% 52.5% Evaluation data [20]
Worst case: -25% of the base case
Best case: +25% of the base case
Costs per household (EUR):
Incremental costs per household in LIG program (societal perspective) 1,415 1,769 1,061 Incremental cost per household (Table  4)
Worst case: +25% of the base case
     Best case: -25% of the base case
  1. HDDS: Household Dietary Diversity Score; FCS: Food Consumption Score.