Table 2 Input data and model assumptions
From: Cost-effectiveness of changes in alcohol taxation in Denmark: a modelling study
Change in taxation | 20% increase | 100% increase | 10% decrease | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention effect (mean (SD)) [Distribution] | -1.4% (0.1) | -6.9% (0.7) | 0.7% (0.1) | National Danish prevention taskforce [22]. Based on estimates from the ministry of taxation |
[Normal] | [Normal] | [Normal] | ||
Tax level after tax change (Price per litre pure alcohol) | Beer: €8.2 | Beer: €13.6 | Beer: €6.1 | National Danish prevention Taskforce [22]. Based on estimates from the Ministry of Taxation |
Wine: €8.1 | Wine: €13.4 | Wine: €6.0 | ||
Spirits: €24.1 | Spirits: €40.2 | Spirits: €18.1 | ||
Target population | Current Danish population | - | ||
Proportion of population | 100% of non-abstainers | - | ||
Price elasticity | Beer: -0.2, wine: -0.25, spirits: -0.3 | National Danish prevention taskforce [22]. Based on estimates from the ministry of taxation | ||
Time horizon | 100Â years | - | ||
Effect decay rate | 2% | Reflecting the rate of inflation; statistics Denmark [36] | ||
Discount rate (costs and effects) | 3% | - | ||
Intervention costs [Distribution] | None | National Danish prevention taskforce [22] | ||
[None] | ||||
Cost offsets [Distribution] | Calculated based on Danish cost data | See ‘Methods’ for details on calculation methods | ||
[Normal] | ||||
Estimates of Relative risk [Distribution] | See Table 1 | - | ||
[Normal (ln RR)] | ||||