Skip to main content

Table 5 Number of HIV infections averted for different efficient/equitable scenarios with the relative weight w eq /w ef

From: Efficient and equitable HIV prevention: A case study of male circumcision in South Africa

Relative weight w eq /w ef

Number of HIV infections averted

     0 a

4,008

     0.5

3,889

     1 b

3,749

     2

3,559

     3

3,438

     4

3,378

     5

3,342

     10

3,270

     ∞ c

3,198

  1. a ‘Purely efficient allocation’; b ‘half efficient/half equitable allocation’; c ‘purely equitable allocation’.