Skip to main content

Table 5 Number of HIV infections averted for different efficient/equitable scenarios with the relative weight w eq /w ef

From: Efficient and equitable HIV prevention: A case study of male circumcision in South Africa

Relative weight w eq /w ef Number of HIV infections averted
     0 a 4,008
     0.5 3,889
     1 b 3,749
     2 3,559
     3 3,438
     4 3,378
     5 3,342
     10 3,270
     ∞ c 3,198
  1. a ‘Purely efficient allocation’; b ‘half efficient/half equitable allocation’; c ‘purely equitable allocation’.