Table 4 Feedback from committee members on the EVIDEM process compared to current approaches
Component | Total number of responses | Distribution responses (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | Improved | Same | Worse |
Intervention under scrutiny | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Understanding of intervention | 8 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
Access to evidence on intervention | 8 | 25 | 75 | 0 |
Access to quality assessment of evidence on intervention | 8 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
Deliberative process | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Considering all key elements of decision | 8 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
Expressing personal/expert opinion | 9 | 11 | 89 | 0 |
Sharing & discussing values among committee members | 9 | 22 | 78 | 0 |
Communication of decision | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Transparency of decision | 9 | 56 | 44 | 0 |
Understandability of decision by stakeholders | 9 | 56 | 44 | 0 |
Acceptability of decision by stakeholders | 7 | 43 | 57 | 0 |